DENOTATIVE LINGUISTIC OPPOSITIONS AND THEIR DOCTRINAL DIMENSIONS IN ARABIC TEXTS: AN APPLIED STUDY ON THE MECCAN SURAT AL-DUHA
Dr. Shaima Muhammad Tawfeeq Mulla Hussain
Assistant Professor in the Department of Language, Grammar and Morphology, College of Arabic Language, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
This research examines the denotative linguistic oppositions and their doctrinal dimensions in Arabic texts. It is applied on the Meccan Surat Al-Duha. This topic emerges from the linguistic differentiation of its types and its doctrinal dimensions by inserting the word and its opposite, mentioning the factor and deleting its direct object, and mediating between the word and what it asks for. In case of oath, the condition is mediated between its elements, in the superlative style the description is mediated between the preferred and the preferred upon, while in the negative style the subject is mediated between its events. It presents a linguistic, semantic, rhetorical, and doctrinal analysis of the methods of denotative linguistic oppositions in the Arabic text, combining the rules of Arabic grammar, the methods of Arabic rhetoric, and the purposes of faith, highlighting the apparent commonness with its dimensions and types under study. The analytical linguistic, semantic, doctrinal, and initiative approach was inspired by it, leading to the occurrence of denotative linguistic correspondence with its doctrinal dimensions in Arabic texts in a single verbal manner, and in a definite syntactic manner, in the two types of declarative and constructional linguistic styles, with what it entails in the style of oath, negation, interrogative, prohibition, and command. And that dealing with linguistic texts in the light of denotative linguistic oppositions, with their various doctrinal dimensions, is a type of metasynthetic analysis that this study recommends. It is the analysis that works to transform the structure’s according to the many grammatical, rhetorical and doctrinal meanings they indicate within the limits of what the text permits and accepts in a linguistic setting and an authentic interpretive law.
Keywords: creation, situation, replacement, male, deletion, centering.