COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIAN INK AND CULTURE AS DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR CRYPTOCOCCAL MENINGITIS IN HIV/AIDS PATIENTS IN GUAYAQUIL

Received: 19.09.2021; Revised: 28.10.2021, Accepted: 26.11.2021, Published Online: 28.12.2021

Dra.  Rita García Calvo

Msc, médico. (Main Author), Universidad Católica Santiago De Guayaquil, emmydaniela21@hotmail.com, 0000-0003-1483-245X

Dra. Dora Hasang Morán

Msc. medico Infectologo. (Main Author), do_hasang@hotmail.com, 0000-0002-7393-124X

 Lic. Nidia   Alava Rengifo

Msc, nidia_alava@yahoo.es, 0000-0001-5388-2447

Lic. Jonathan   Mendoza Villón

jon_1987pas@hotmail.com, 0000-0003-1351-2083

 Dany  Martínez  Gómez

Msc, dany-lab2011@hotmail.com, 0000-0001-9233-6369

 Dra. Rocío  Alexandra Sánchez  Rodríguez

dra.rociosanchez@gmail.com, 0000-0002-4924-5338

Abstract

Introduction: Cryptococcal meningitis is a serious mycosis caused by the fungus Cryptococcus, commonly associated with AIDS.  Diagnostic screening includes direct examination with Chinese ink, culture, histopathological study, determination of capsular antigen, and detection by PCR technique, however, only the first two methods are performed in the institution under study, being culture the method of choice. OBJECTIVES: To know the sensitivity and specificity of the Chinese ink test compared to cerebrospinal fluid culture in the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis associated with HIV/AIDS, in patients treated at the Hospital of Infectious Diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive analytical study was performed on the clinical records of patients containing mycological reports of Chinese stains and CSF cultures processed during 2019 and 2020.  RESULTS: Ninety-six CSF samples were obtained in which Chinese ink and CSF mycological culture results were reported. India ink and culture had a sensitivity of 98 and 96% respectively, while specificity was 50% for India ink and 100% for culture. CONCLUSIONS: India ink is a highly sensitive, rapid and reliable method, however, it loses usefulness in disease follow-up as it does not distinguish between active or convalescent disease, where culture still has the last word.